Apparently, yet another Golden Age DC comic is up for auction. A copy of Detective Comics #27 that not only has a CGC rating of 7, but is known to have had exactly one owner. Sacramento resident Robert Irwin bought the issue for the original cover price of ten cents from a news agency owned by the father of a friend back in 1939. He's had it in a box with 1930's issues of National Geographic and Popular Mechanics. Bidding will run through mid-November and it's expected to sell somewhere in the $400,000 range.
I have two things to comment on here. First: ANOTHER one? Seriously? We just did this back in February! How rare is this book really?
Second: Where the #$@%*#@!!! are people getting the kind of money you need to be able to sell these types of books? I have a good job, pay my bills, don't splurge on extravagances (or anything else, for that matter) and I don't even make a third of what the current bid is, much less whatever the final might be. If you have $400,000 to blow on a comic book during a recession, you are an asshole. You know, how about a few bucks towards a charity? Any charity. Personally, I'd suggest the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund but the Hero Initiative does good work too. You want more personal, how about helping one of the several comics folks who are having trouble making the rent right now? I won't even laughingly suggest sending money to me this time -- there are more people out there with more dire needs than me. Could I use some more money? Sure, but I'm okay right now.
In all seriousness, to whoever is putting in six figure bids on a comic book: I'm sure you've got a comfortable income and feel justified in splurging on yourself by buying a really rare comic book. I get that. And I'd wouldn't be surprised to learn that you DO actually donate quite a lot to various charities, and that $400,000 is a drop in your financial bucket. But, really, I have loved comics my whole life and I would be honored to own a copy of Detective #27, but that money can go to SO MANY better places. Even if you split it seven or eight ways, I'm sure that would still benefit those people I cited earlier a great deal more than you might think.
- ► 2016 (172)
- ► 2015 (253)
- ► 2014 (259)
- ► 2013 (342)
- ► 2012 (372)
- ► 2011 (367)
- The 14th Dalai Lama Review
- A Curmudgeon's Take On Halloween
- The Daily News, Take 2
- Yet Another Detective 27 Up For Sale?!?
- The Adventures Of Unemployed Man Review
- Fist Stick Knife Gun Review
- Today's Adventures At B&N
- The Reconcilers Review
- These Kids Today Don't Know Their History!
- Comic Fandom: Don't Be Doing It Wrong
- My UW Comics
- Fummetti/Illustrated Comics?
- A Non-Partisan Political Rant Which Lightly Touche...
- Arrests Made In Comic Book Burglary Case
- Mad Friday Night Ramblings
- I'm Calling Mash-Ups On Account Of Sickness
- I Think You're Sauceome
- Happy Birthday, Jerk!
- The Power Of Branding
- Hatter M, Nature of Wonder Review
- Time For Some Self-Promotion
- The Hero Who Could Be You... As Long As You're A W...
- Arcana Who?
- Weighing In On This Comics Journalism Hoohah... Ag...
- Iconography For Kirby's Unfinished Sagas?
- Just In Time For Halloween
- Saturday Comics History Link-Blogging
- Paul Conrad: Drawing Fire
- ▼ October (29)
- ► 2009 (365)
- ► 2008 (358)
- ► 2007 (382)