I see all sorts of recommendations for comics and graphic novels I should try. Some are directed to me specifically, and some are just towards everyone. In many cases, my interest is piqued enough to consider them but not enough to buy them straight away in lieu of some other books that I'm already excited about. In those cases, what I'll typically do is add the book to my cart on Amazon. Then I'll consider it again the next time I'm making a purchase there. "Oh, yeah, this was the book that so-and-so recommended."
What inevitably happens is that I wind up with a cart with any number of books shunted over into the "Save for Later" section. And while I do scan through those before each Amazon purchase, I eventually get to a point where I no longer remember why I might've been interested in the first place. At that point, it's kind of a crap shoot whether I ultimately opt to ever buy the book or not.
I'm okay with reading not-great books. As much as I prefer really high quality material, I don't mind when I occassionally pick up something that doesn't seem to fire on all cynlanders. I think there's plenty to learn if you're willing to figure out precisely why you didn't like something, and what might have been done differently to improve upon it. But I'm always left wondering how books like that get made.
I mean, I don't doubt that the creators did what they could to put together the best story they were able. And maybe they ran up against a deadline of some sort, and didn't have time to make it as well as they'd like. Or maybe they were fighting off a bad illness, and couldn't function at their best capacity. Or maybe the artist and writer were working at cross-purposes for some reason.
So from a business perspective, if an editor or publisher sees the work, they almost certainly recognize it of lesser quality, how do they go about with the decision to publish? Do they think it's not bad enough to discard entirely, and they might at least make back the money they spent to have it created? Do they have deadlines or quoatas they need to hit? Are they so oblivious to the creation process that they don't even recognize it's not very good?
I'm sure that every not great book has it's own unique set of circumstances; I'm just honestly curious about the business decisions that lead to their actual production. Anyone have any insights or anecdotes they might be able to share?
- ► 2016 (306)
- ► 2015 (253)
- 2014 & Beyond!
- On History: This is Indicative of... Something
- On Business: Patreon Launch
- On Strips: Dropped Joke
- Santa Sinnott
- On History: Where to Draw the Line?
- On Business: Printing Meh Books
- On Strips: No Longer Relevant
- On -isms: Unsounded
- On History: These Kids Today
- On Business: Don't Do What He Did
- On Strips: 1963 James Swinnerton Interview
- On -isms: And Furries Too!
- On History: Looking Backwards AND Forwards
- On Business: Conventioneering Gear
- On Strips: Subject Diversity
- On -isms: Diversify Your Authors
- On History: Reprint Requests
- On Business: Comparable Goods
- ▼ December (23)
- ► 2013 (342)
- ► 2012 (372)
- ► 2011 (367)
- ► 2010 (382)
- ► 2009 (365)
- ► 2008 (358)
- ► 2007 (382)