I think that, at some level, most comics readers realize that the comics they read are commercial ventures. It's not about the entertainment, but that you're willing to pay for that entertainment. There's nothing wrong with that, and it almost certainly wouldn't work under a barter type system.
When someone starts a comic, it's often under the goal of telling a story they feel is important, or trying to say something that no one else is saying. That doesn't pay the bills, of course, and so they look towards ways to monetize what they're doing. If they're talented enough, they're able to find enough people to give them enough money to live off. If they're extremely talented, they're able to find enough people to give them enough money to live off month-after-month for years on end.
On the flip side, look at some of the webcomic artists who aren't making a living off their art yet. Their stories might not be crafted as well, or look as polished, but they're passionate about them and will certainly tell you all about it if you show the slightest interest.
So when does that flip take place? When does an artist start thinking about her/his work as a financial level instead of capital-A Art?
More to the point, is it necessarily bad when they do so?
Obviously, that flip occurs at different times for different people. But my guess is that when they start viewing individual readers as unimportant, that's when it's worth noting. When they're generally pleased and touched by every fan letter they get, they're still looking at their work as Art and the pleasure comes from having connected with someone via that Art. When they get to a point where "your comments are appreciated" and they're more impressed by the volume of messages overall without much concern for individual notes, that's when the business switch has occurred.
And while there's nothing wrong with that per se, I think it's important, as readers, to recognize when that occurs. When Jack Kirby and Stan Lee were working on Avengers #16, I'm pretty sure they still cared about readers thought and paid attention to the letters fans wrote it. That's part of how/why the direction of the book proceeded forward the way it did. As to whether or not your opinion matters on the upcoming Avengers movie--I think it's safe to say Marvel doesn't care all that much. Because whether you see it or not, whether you're interested in it or not, there are going to be hundreds of thousands of others who happily plunk down some of their hard-earned cash to buy a movie ticket to go see it.
So let me ask you this: is it worth complaining about an Avengers movie where your opinion doesn't really matter to the people making the movie? On the flip side, how much impact do you suppose you have when you tell a largely unknown artist how you really like the webcomic they just started, and how you're interested in seeing it develop along certain lines?
Something to consider as you decided where you focus your critiquing energies.
- ► 2016 (306)
- ► 2015 (253)
- On Strips: Video Collection
- On -isms: Comics for the Blind
- On History: McCay in San Fran circa 1920
- On Business: The Problem with DC
- On Strips: Sad Pictures for Children
- On -isms: Labels
- On History: Digital vs Analog
- On Business: When You Become Unimportant
- On Strips: Pearls of Fortune
- On -sims: Latino Comic Con
- On History: Barbara Hall
- On History: Nostalgia vs History
- On Strips: Goodbye New York Post
- On -isms: Historical Context
- On History: The Sinking of the Luisitania
- On Business: A FCBD Story
- On Strips: Ron Cobb
- On -isms: Sean's Swap Challenge
- ▼ May (22)
- ► 2013 (342)
- ► 2012 (372)
- ► 2011 (367)
- ► 2010 (382)
- ► 2009 (365)
- ► 2008 (358)
- ► 2007 (382)