Lenticular Comics?

Let's start off with a description of lenticular printing. Here's what is on Wikipedia...

Lenticular printing is a multi-step process that consists of creating a lenticular image from at least two images, and placing it behind a lenticular lens.

Once the images are collected, they are arranged in individual frame files, then digitally combined into a single file in a process called interlacing. Interlacing can be done manually using a raster graphics editor or using dedicated interlacing software.

The interlaced image may be printed directly on the back (smooth side) of the lens, or on a substrate (ideally a synthetic paper) that is laminated to the lens. When printing on the backside of the lens, the critical registration of the fine "slices" of interlaced images must be absolutely correct during the lithographic or screen printing process to avoid "ghosting" and poor image definition.

If that didn't quite make sense, how about an example? Remember the shields that came with the original Secret Wars action figures? You dropped one of the cards into the shield and then it changed images depending on the angle you looked at it. Those are lenticular images. If I recall correctly, DC used them as a gimmick on several of their "Rebirth" comics a couple years ago too.

OK, we all good on what lenticular images are?

Now, the reason I bring this up isn't to talk about gimmick covers or old toys. I bring this up because I recently realized that a single lenticular image is, in and of itself, a comic. You have multiple images depicted in a sequence that have to be viewed spatially.

Let's take an obvious example. I believe this image comes from an old Cracker Jack box...

Now, obviously you've got a sequence of three images that, when run together, look like an animation of a magician pulling a rabbit out of his hat. What is animation, though? It's a series of still images that, when shown in rapid succession in the same space, give the illusion of movement. But if you take those images and lay them out next to one another physically, they become a comic. The classic The Horse in Motion "film" isn't actually a film at all -- it was created using a series of different still cameras timed to take a sequence of images. A comic.

Now, going back to our animated magician, we have what appears to be a three-frame animation. But here's the thing: you had to tilt it to see the animation. Same with those Secret Wars shields or the "Rebirth" covers. By tilting the object, your eye catches it at a different angle and you see a different image.

Here's the thing, though: when you tilt it, it changes position. It's very close to where it started, but it's in a different place, however slight the movement is. If you hold that animated magician card in your hand, you see the first "frame" of the sequence. As long as you don't move your hand relative to your eye, it will stay stuck on that same image. In order to see the next "frame" you have to move. The card the image is printed on will no longer be in the same place and you see the next image. The movement is very slight, but you're looking at a different spot. Just the same as if you went from panel 1 of a comic to panel 2.

So if you have a sequence of images, and they're viewed in a deliberate sequence that's dictated by where they're placed in space, how is that not comic? It might be only two panels, but this is every bit a comic that the latest issue of Amazing Spider-Man is...!

Related Items craft