Rina Piccolo of Tina's Groove tried it in 2010, but couldn't make the economics work. Julie Larson toyed with the idea around the same time, but couldn't manage to self-syndicate her existing The Dinette Set, much less branch out into a full webcomics model. (She retired from comics entirely last year.) Not to mention in-strip jabs and snide interview comments about webcomics generally from the likes Brian (Hi and Lois) Walker, Wiley (Non Sequitur) Miller, and Stephan (Pearls Before Swine) Pastis. There just seemed to be this huge gulf between newspaper cartoonists and webcomics.
So how did Cravens become seemingly the only cartoonist to straddle both sides of that divide?
Yesterday, he posted this piece in which he muses about being "an analog cartoonist in a digital world." He attributes much of split between these two cartooning worlds to being born in 1965 -- the cutoff year between Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. He grew up getting the last vestiges of being completely analog and the first glimpses of a society going digital.
That's certainly part of it. If you were drawing comics and had a well-established career in cartooning before, say, 1984, there would have been no reason to experiment with those new-fangled techie do-dads because you'd been working fine in good ol' print, thankyouverymuch. A teenager in 1984 would've grown up playing video games, and digital technology would be a more natural part of daily life. (My family got an Atari in, I think, 1980. I would've been eight, and I recall Dad hooking it up and testing it for the first time. My brother, only two and half years younger than me, I don't believe recalls ever NOT having access to video games.)
But Pastis was born in 1968, three years after Cravens. Piccolo was born in 1966. Why have they had difficulties that Cravens doesn't seem to? The answer seems to be hidden towards the end of his missive...
We have a foot in either place. I still draw a newspaper comic strip (The Buckets) for which newspaper income is declining and web income is, slowly, increasing. But in a panic that I’d be left behind, sweatily poking a gnarled finger on whatever will replace the iPad and swearing “Gol-darn” and “Dagnabbit”, I started a webcomic (hubriscomics.com) so I’d HAVE to learn to keep up.Cravens didn't just look at webcomics and say, "Huh. That might be an interesting thing to try." He looked at webcomics and said, "OH SNAP! I need to learn this, like, yesterday!" I think it's that willingness to dive in (even if it's done out of fear of falling behind) that doesn't seem to be universal among cartoonists of that late Baby Boomer/early Gen X cohort. It's not only seeing those changes taking place, but seeing a need to act on them before being overtaken. Maybe it's because Cravens saw his own father face that "sorry, we're letting you go so we don't have to pay a pension" change in the workplace that showed him first-hand what happens with career obsolescence. Maybe there's something else.
Age certainly has something to do with it, but only because older generations didn't experience dramatic corporate shifts like that. If your dads and uncles managed to retire from the same place they'd worked for 40 years, maybe that panic Cravens feels wouldn't be as visceral to you, even if you were born a decade later.
But in any event, Cravens is a great cartoonist to watch, I think. He's got a handle on two notably different aspects of cartooning that I don't think I've seen anywhere else. (Brad Guigar of Evil Inc kind of did until recently, but while he did work for a newspaper, he didn't quite nail the nationally syndicated cartoonist angle.) He certainly doesn't maintain a model that can be easily emulated (if at all) but he's definitely got a perspective that can't be shared from anyone else.