Latest Posts

One of the personal challeneges I have is having a good understanding of the difficulties some people face with gender dysphoria and how they emotionally navigate their transition. The people I know personally had undergone their transition before I even knew them, and I've never felt we were close enough to really probe deep into the subject. So when I'd heard that Emma Grove's debut graphic novel, The Third Person, focused on her own transition, I was interested to check it out.

I don't know if this is still the case or not, but at least in the early 2000s, a person needed to undergo some psychological evaluation and get the written approval of a therapist before they could undergo hormone treatments of gender-altering surgery. That's what led Edgar, at age 33, to seek out a therapist. They'd been aware of their gender dysphoria since they were a child and had been going out at times as a woman since their twenties, so the therapist was almost just a formality as far as they were concerned. But since Ed was more comfortable as a woman, they went as Katina for the first couple months. Most of the book takes place in the therapist's office as Toby probes into the motivations of Edgar/Katina/Emma for wanting to fully transition. It becomes quickly apparent, however, that these identities are not just personas for different social situations but almost pitch-perfect textbook manifestations of dissociative identity disorder (D.I.D.). Toby then spends much of the book doing a phenomenally bad -- borderline abusive -- job of trying to get to the bottom of things. But because Ed and Katina and Emma don't always communicate with each other very well, and Toby himself is such bad communicator, they make very little progress. Interestingly, though, the readers learn a great deal during this time, and much of the lack of progress comes from Toby refusing to believe Katina. It's only after Toby finally kicks Katina out for good and Ed reads up on D.I.D. on their own that they're able to start making progress. Things go much better with the new therapist, and Emma is finally able to reconcile with the traumas of her childhood, her identity, and living her life.

It should come as little surprise that a memoir about someone wrestling with their very identity can be very heart-breaking at times. What people expect of you and how they treat you, versus who you actually are. And when that's centered around something as fundamental as gender -- partiularly in a society that has long promoted gender as a nature-induced binary -- and then you layer childhood trauma on top of that... well, it's little wonder D.I.D. comes out as a response. The idea of blanking out and suddenly coming back with no memory of what transpired in the sometimes weeks in bewteen must be -- and is portrayed here -- as very confusing and terrifying. I know that not everyone who transitions suffers/has suffered D.I.D. but Grove's depiction makes it very understandable and relatable.

I was struck by Grove's illustration style. It's very minimalist, to the point of using any sort of backgrounds at all only if they're absolutely necessary. And she also uses a pretty rigid eight-panel grid system for her page layouts. The two combined make it seem at first blush to be almost naive or amatuerish, but it becomes clear as the book progresses that they're deliberate design choices. The simplisitic illustration style means much of the emphasis for the figures is shown through body language, and this is absolutely critical for differentiating between Ed, Katina, and Emma. It also means that much more when Grove breaks out of that -- when she starts making elements more detailed, they're worth paying attention to. The same can be said of the grid system -- when she breaks the regular structure, it's for a good reason! There's some particularly nice payoffs on both of these towards the end of the book.

Interestingly, the grid system seemed to originate from her writing process. From her backmatter notes, Grove says she didn't really start with a script but just starting sketching out individual events and conversations as she remembered them, and then literally cut and pasted the sketched panels together to form an overall narrative. (Apparently, there were elements she never really reflected on before and as she started piecing together how the timelines for Ed, Katina, and Emma all lined up, she was able to answer some long-unsolved mysteries of why items may have "disappeared" or how she "suddenly" found herself at a location with no recollection of how she got there.) While she did go back and redraw everything, using a standard grid system in the creation process meant that piecing together previously disparate sequences would be much easier. And while she could have restructed page layouts, I'm sure that, in looking over, the puzzle pieces of the narrative, she realized how much more powerful breaking that format would be once she finally did.

I will admit that looking at a 900+ page book once it arrives is daunting. I don't recall the last time I cracked open a book with a 2½ inch wide spine! It is, however, a very engaging and smooth read despite some potentially very confusing scenes; that Grove makes the transitions from Ed to Katina to Emma only confusing when it's confusing for themself highlights some excellent storytelling chops. Having read the book, I do have a better understanding of both some of the emotional and societal challenges around transitioning as well as the practicalities of D.I.D. (as opposed to many of the stereotypes often used in Hollywood). This is still Grove's own story, though, so I'm sure it's not representative of everyone's journey but it does help give me more ground to build my knowledge and empathy from.

The Third Person came out a couple months back from Drawn and Quarterly and retails for $39.95 US. It should be available from any contemporary bookstore and is well worth taking a look at.
Here are this week's links to what I've had published recently...

Kleefeld on Comics: Abie the Agent
https://ift.tt/lgprLN5

Kleefeld on Comics: Analyzing a Collection
https://ift.tt/mqP0Wlk

Kleefeld on Comics: A Special Mid-Year's Message
https://ift.tt/fZINBYW

Kleefeld on Comics: UFO and Outer Space #21
https://ift.tt/nQYmiKW

Kleefeld on Comics: The Comic Organizer
https://ift.tt/YzRXDT7


When I first started collecting comics and going on the hunt for back issues, I was able to keep track of pretty much everything in my head. Even when I started having trouble remembering individual issue numbers, I could recognize covers pretty readily. But then I bough a copy of Fantastic Four #76.

I came home from, I think, one of the local mini-conventions with the find. Probably fairly cheap given that I was still in school. But when I went to file it away, I discovered I already had a copy! I'd apparently bought it before and didn't remember doing so. But then, when I started to slide the new copy behind the one I'd just realized I already had, there was ANOTHER copy there! I had already bought it once, forgotten it, bought it a second time, and forgotten both that I'd already bought it and also what must surely have been some annoyance at having discovered that I'd bought it a second time.

That's when I started keeping a written list with me. It was nothing elaborate, just a small sheet of note paper with the issue numbers I wanted hand-written on it. I'd scratch out the numbers as I picked them, and periodically re-write the list when it had too many scratches on it to be easily readible.

These days, of course, I like to use an online database which I can access via my phone. Although my previous one, ComicBookDB, got shut down and I haven't found a suitable replacement. I gave CLZ a very solid try, but there's no consistency to the titling. That's probably fine if you've only got a handful of titles, but my collection is somewhere north of 25,000 issues now ranging from the 1940s to today; if I don't have a clean set of data, I'm never going to be able to tell what I even have, much less be able to find it. I'm currently working out of Google Sheets, but that is really slow and tedious for the number of comics I have. Plus I think transferring data around has generated some duplicate entries. I'm going to try the Grand Comics DB next and see if I can't clean everything up. (Again.)

But do you know what oragnized people did before databases? This...
KC Carlson actually posted about his use of the cards (sans binder) about a decade ago. He doesn't provide a specific timeline, but I get the impression that they weren't around very long. The copyrights on the two cards he presents give at least a five year range, though, so they were along longer than I would've expected.
You're at least nominally familiar with the first appearance of Marvel's Vision character, right? From Avengers #57...
As you might also be aware, the character design and pose is loosely based on the first appearance of the Golden Age version of the Vision as seen in Marvel Mysetery Comics #13...
Because Avengers #57 was the modern character's first appearance AND a pretty iconic cover, it's been homaged a number of times, particularly when it's a story relating somehow to the Vision. I won't share every instance, but here's a few...
Interestingly, writer Chuck Miller posted another cover on Tuesday that seems to me to have been directly sourced from Avengers #57 but I've never seen recognized as such. This issue of UFO & Outer Space came about a full decade after the modern Vision had been around and borrows not only the pose but much of the character design as well...
Now, whether artist Chuck Liese borrowed the elements of his own accord or editor Michael Teitelbaum handed him a copy of Avengers #57 and said, "Base the character off this," I don't know. Given that Liese only did a handful of covers in the late 1970s and all of them for Western/Gold Key/Whitman, I suspect the idea wasn't entirely his. He doesn't seem well connected to the comics industry, and the cover/story wouldn't be reprinted in the US until a few years later, so it was well out of common circulation at the time. (The story had actually been printed in the UK a few years prior, but Liese was based out of New York City for most of his life and would have been unlikely to have seen that.)

Interestingly, the original art for this came up for auction back in 2005 and sold for less than $400. Again, no mention is made of any reference to Avengers #57 or the Vision, but I can't see how it wasn't a direct reference.
I know I've had my "Special New Year's Message" as the featured post on my home page since January. I deliberately have kept that up because I remember thinking it spoke to how shitty everything is, and that I wanted to offer some encouragement to you without some saccharine sense of blind hope or naive optismism. But I only just read the piece again now, over half-way through the year.

Things are a little different now than they were then, but not really improved. I've seen a number of businesses go to reduced hours, and some have even closed entirely because they couldn't get enough employees in. (Which, to be clear, I entirely blame on the businesses for treating their employees like shit and/or not paying them a living wage.) While people seem to be trying to travel more, I've heard more than a few stories of flights being canceled at the last minute because the airlines either didn't have enough staff to man the plane (see previous) and/or they had too few passengers to make the flight profitable. The number of daily new COVID cases is higher that just about any point in 2020 or 2021, and it's uncommon -- bordering on rare -- to see anyone in public wearing a mask any more. Russia has been waging war in Ukraine since late February, which has jacked up prices on everything from bread to gasoline. Similarly, inflation in general has been outpacing wage increases by about double for much of the year.

And then in the US specifically, we've seen abortion rights absolutely gutted by one branch of government, and the other two responding by basically just shrugging their shoulders and saying we should vote. There was primary voting in Ohio yesterday using illegally gerrymandered districts -- not "hey, I think those maps are bad" type of illegal but a state judge rendering an official judgement that they were against the law... but they should go ahead and use them anyway. Thanks to climate change, half of the US has been experiencing a massive heat wave and other portions have been hit with massive, record-breaking floods. The governmental response seems woefully inadequate, having been systematcially gutted over the past couple of decades.

I could go on, but you don't need me to tell you how awful things are. Frankly, you're probably experiencing some aspect of it more directly and more profoundly than I am. I'm still doing what I can to help: pledging to Kickstarters more to help the creator than anything else, donating to GoFundMe campaigns, trying to be as emotionally supportive as I can.

But I want to reiterate what I said back in January. You, the person reading this blog right now, are worth it. It might sound a bit hokey since this post is just out for everyone on the internet to stumble across but, let's face it, most people aren't reading it. If my site stats are accurate, the odds of more than 100 people reading this are minimal. But that means that you're important to me. Not because you're a number in my site analytics, but because you and I are making a connection of some kind here. That you're here, reading my blatherings, means you and I share some thoughts and ideas. Probably some ideologies. I write mainly for myself, which means that, if you're responding to any of this, you and I share a common bond.

So when I say that I believe in you, I am indeed saying that to you. I know you're just trying to get through the day. I know you're trying to do the best you can for you and your family, and that it gets hard sometimes. So hard that even simple chores you've been dealing with for decades -- dishes, laundry, walking the dog... -- seem like massive hurdles to get through, and it's a real struggle to get any of them done. I want to let you know that that's okay, though. Survival is a massive challenge right now. I've seen only a handful of people who've been willing and able to acknowledge how hard it is just to adult these days.

Staying alive and (reasonably) healthy is more than a lot of people are able to manage these days. I don't say that to make light of those who haven't been able to -- I've had three friends in the past fifteen years take their own life -- but to emphasize that life is fucking hard to begin with and the past several years have gotten immeasurably worse. I have said repeatedly and without any intention of hyperbole that literally everyone in the US is currently experiencing a massive trauma. No one is okay right now.

Just do what you can, when you can, with what you have. Reach out if you need help. Physically, mentally, or emotionally. To a friend, a family member, me... even a help line you might not think will amount to anything. Don't just pretend things are alright; they're very much not. We all need help right now. Don't beat yourself up for not being better or doing more. Your survival is enough right now. Stick with me for another pass around the sun. I believe you can do it.

You.

Yes, you.
I mentioned last week that I had just picked up the comics collection a friend of mine had willed to me. I've skimmed over most of it at this point, and gone through about a third with a somewhat closer eye, and I inadvertently found myself analyzing how he collected comics. I had done something like this with a collection I found back in 2015 but that was almost entirely speculation. Since I knew who this collection came from, I've been going through it with a little more insight into his interests and preferences.

Some aspects of it were something of a "given" going in. I knew he liked both Starman and Transformers, for example, so I'm not at all surprised to see a lot of those books. He had a number of Elric titles and, while it wasn't top of mind when I thought of him, I do recall him mentioning that he liked the character at some point. But those all had the feel of regular comic shop visits; he went to a local comic shop on some schedule and pulled down the latest issue(s) of those titles. Fairly typical comic fan behavior.

But the interesting finds have been the ones where there was a more specific and considered purpose behind which issues he picked up. There were a number of Dr. Strange books, but no more than a handful of issues across a range of titles. Same with Iron Man. But it didn't take much additional scrutiny to notice that several of those issues featured Dr. Doom as the villain. He was following the character almost as readily as the Fantastic Four but, as a villain, he would show up sporadically in a variety of titles.

But not all those issues featured a common character like that. So how else was he collecting? Well, I found a number of reprint style books. A number of books like Marvel Tales, Classic X-Men, and Marvel Super Action. He would take an interest in a character and try to look up the earliest stories to see the original conception and earliest developments to get a better understand of how they got to be the character they are now. And while you can do that now by purchasing any of a number of different reprint collections, that's really only been a viable option for the past 15-20 years or so. Before that, reprints were harder to come by, particularly for 'regular' issues -- you were mostly forced to look at either the original back issues or reprint titles. So rather than tracking down the earliest issues of Avengers, he picked up Marvel Triple Action. It would've been several years since those had been available new, but the reprint titles -- even as back issues -- are almost always far cheaper than the originals.

He's also got a variety of titles from more independent creators -- I found one book with a hand-written note from the author thanking him for supporting their crowd-funding campaign -- and a few creators like Eddie Campbell and Seth, folks who Matt seemed to pick up virtually everything they did.

What really strikes me about the whole collection, and his whole approach to collecting, is how very similar it is to my own. And despite that, there seem to be very few direct overlaps. We apparently took very similar approaches, but largely targeting different characters and different creators. But while he focused more on Spider-Man, I have more Moon Knight. He's got more Alan Moore and I have more Neil Gaiman. I'm probably not going to like some of his comics as much as the ones I purchased for myself, but stylistically, they're incredibly similar. I don't think we had any direct influence over each other on our approaches (we both suggested specific titles to one another from time to time, but never methodologies) so it's interesting that we landed on the same idea independently. And that we thought alike in that way is probably a large part of why we were friends for a quarter century!

It's a novel prospect, looking through someone else's collection and trying to ascertain why they purchased what they did and how they approached the hobby in general, particularly if you know the person in question and can use what you know of them to see how the personality you know informs how they collect.
One thing you don't see much any more is how comic strips could influence American culture. Obviously the newspaper used to be a much more prominent part of shaping perceptions; before the advent of television, newspaper were really the only way to communicate anything visually to a mass audience. You'll occasionally run across stories about how Sadie Hawkins Day came out of Li'l Abner or how the Jeep was probably named after the character in the Popeye comics. One that I hadn't seen before is how Harry Hershfield's Abie the Agent was used to fight Jewish stereotypes.

In 1910, Hershfield started a strip called Desperate Desomnd, a parody of adventure melodramas in a similar vein as Milt Gross' He Done Her Wrong from two decades later. He incorporated a Yiddish character into the strip, which proved a positive move and Hershfield's editor encouraged him to start a new strip focusing on the Jewish experience in America. Thus, Abie the Agent was born.

Abraham Kabibble* was a car salesman and, while he and the other Jewish characters depicted used some strong elements of Jewish culture to emphasize their roots, Hershfield was careful to avoid using those elements as part of the humor itself. For example...

Abie is clearly speaking a forced dialect, and the two characters have decidedly Jewish-sounding names, but there's no demeaning of the characters because of that. Hershfield is relying on some stereotypes, but not as the focus of the humor itself. He's basically using the strip to showcase that Jewish Americans are pretty much just like other Americans and weren't deserving of the broad slander that was often cast against them at the time. This was further emphasized in 1917 when Abie enlisted in the US Army to fight during World War I.

Clearly, Abie the Agent didn't change the hearts and minds of everybody overnight, and there would still be anti-Jewish sentiment in some circles for years. But being popular enough to have several strip collections made, two animated cartoons, and a reference in the Marx Brothers classic Animal Crackers suggest that it did help many Americans begin to accept and understand Jews as people just like them.

Kind of a pity that newspapers don't have that same pull today; maybe we could get a new version called Abhed the Agent.

* As far as I can tell, this is the first instance of "Kabbible" being used as a Jewish name. Merwyn Bogue wouldn't adopt his "Ish Kabbible" stage name for several more years. There was a 1913 song titled "Isch ga-bibble" which Bogue later claimed to have gotten the name from. Whether Hershfield also got the name from the same song is unknown, but it would seem likely as "kabbible" is not a word itself and the song only debuted the year before Abie the Agent.