Latest Posts

Earlier I took a look at some of the hard data points in comics to see what it might suggest about our economy's current status. Now, I'm going to focus on some more anecdotal evidence.

As I stated earlier, there doesn't seem to be a lot of discussion about the current economic climate among comic folks. But the handful of times I have seen it come up, it's drawn some pretty solid responses. Valerie's post particularly, and even moreso if you focus on the responses to her first point. Here's a fairly typical selection of comments...
"What the Amazing Spider-man/One More Day/Brand New Day taught me is that I can drop any comic title from my pull list and never have to worry about it again. Even the titles where I have compiled in a zombie-like fashion 300-400 issue runs."

"A comic needs to be pretty great for me to justify spending money since I have two daughters that always need new shoes."

"I download everything except for trades I read at my local library."

"I now pirate copies most of my comics but i would pay for digital copies legitmately if they were made available."

"We dropped all pulls on monthly floppies with the exception of Steve Rude's Nexus, which comes out infrequently enough to justify any cost on. We buy trades & GNs now when we can."

Tom's last Five for Fridays brought in some similar responses...
"I would love to have Fanta's big new Luba collection, but didn't I already buy all those stories at least twice already?"

"I've already changed my comics buying habits by... waiting for trades."

"I could see my comics-buying habits change in 2009 in that I... will continue to buy those books that I know that I want, but I will be less likely to buy an unfamiliar book that is highly recommended. Or I will buy it much later, used, from a seller on Amazon."

"The last thing having to do with comics I'd ever give up is... downloading 'em for free off the Internet."

"I could see my comics-buying habits change in 2009 in that I... live in an area with a very manga/graphic novel-friendly library system."

The themes of "waiting for the trade", "reading it at the library" and "downloading illegal copies" were repeated frequently. Interestingly, the "waiting for the trade" and "downloading illegal copies" notions have been floating just on publishers' horizons for a few years now -- well before the economic crisis was seen coming by anyone. Both have been trending upwards, and the publishers collectively, from my vantage point, haven't really addressed either issue in any substantive capacity. But it certainly seems that, if the economy doesn't improve, these issues will become much more prominent.

The "reading it at the library" issue is comparatively new in recent memory, but historically, libraries have seen increased foot traffic during recessionary periods. (Personal Fact #5: My father does a lot of freelance work with public libraries across the state, and has made repeated reference to this after having talked hundreds, if not thousands, of librarians over the past several years.) According the American Library Association's web site, "For the past several years the federal budget has been hard on domestic programs. While libraries have seen increases to the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA), many other programs that benefit libraries have been severely cut or in some cases terminated. We follow these other programs as well, because libraries are just one part of a much bigger picture that includes education, the humanities, the arts, and many other important societal functions." The long and short of which is: they've got more people coming in the door, but fewer resources to work with.

This is backed up by my father's evidence. He's working with fewer libraries this year than he did last year. Quantifiably. He's also talked with many of his peers nationwide who can definitively say that they're doing less work for libraries in 2008 than they have in past years. On the anecdotal side again, he's asked some librarians about this, and they've repeatedly said that they have to devote more of our resources directly toward the increased number of customers, instead of the indirect services my father provides.

Now, getting back to my how-this-impacts-you idea, what do all three of these (admittedly, still only anecdotal) trends lead to? Well, the primary and most obvious victims are Local Comic Shops. If people are downloading books or going to the library instead of buying them at their LCS, then the LCS will obviously be bringing in less revenue. The same is true for trade paperbacks, too. Even if fans still continue buying TPBs at their local shop, we're still looking at a difference of selling (for example) five pamphlet books for $2.99 each versus $12.99 for a single TPB. That's a loss of $1.96 which doesn't sound like much, but can add up as the trend increases. What this also does is stagger their income streams -- instead of fans coming in every week on a regular basis, they're now looking at once every five or six weeks. Theoretically, this could even out over time, but the transition from pamphlets to TPBs could substantially disrupt an LCS's current set-up if they're not already prepared for it.

And all that means that it's going to be more difficult for comic retailers to remain in business. If the recession continues throughout 2009 and into 2010, as many economic experts (including my company's CEO) are currently predicting, I don't doubt we'll see more than a few comic shops go bankrupt as they try to weather the storm. Because their costs aren't going down. They still have to pay the rent and utilities; they might be able to cut back on staff, but most of the shops I've seen run pretty lean already. Maybe one or two employees beyond the owners, and they are usually only part-time in the first place. So their costs aren't going down, but they're revenue streams are. Same expenses, less income with which to cover them.

So if the anecdotal evidence I'm citing here is at all indicative of the comic population at large, comic shops are really going to be hurting over the next 12-18 months, as reader look to sources OTHER than their Local Comic Shop.

To be continued...
I can't imagine there are many (any?) of my readers who don't also regularly read Tom Spurgeon's blog, but on the off chance that you haven't seen it: Tom posted a piece early yesterday morning citing why he's been talking so much about the economic crisis amid the generally positive (Tom used the word "giddy") outlook many comics fans have recently adopted in the wake of the presidential election. While I don't frequent message boards as much as I used to, I do read more blogs and I'll agree with him that I haven't seen much internet chatter about the economy from comics folks. As Tom points out, it's a frightening and depressing topic, but he's quite right that we should be discussing it more openly and directly. (I have to admit that I've been pretty remiss in addressing the topic as well. I think with one exception, I've only tangentally alluded to the recession at best.)

It's an interesting dilemma. One of the reasons people enjoy comics is for the escapism, but without addressing the world we're escaping from, there's a chance we might not be able to continue our brief escapes to Dogpatch or Metropolis or Nova Venezia. So, I'm going to see if I can't join Tom to help get the ball rolling with some frank and earnest discussions about the current economy.

Let me start with a few personal facts about where I'm coming from.
  1. My B.S. is in graphic design, but I got an M.B.A. a few years ago. While my concentration was in marketing, there was still lots of economic theory there. I can navigate a balance sheet pretty well.
  2. My day job is with the financing arm of one of the world's largest corporations. We provide the financial backing behind things like your Walmart credit card. The company has maintained its AAA credit rating throughout this whole economic mess.
  3. My own finances are tight these days, due largely to additional costs brought on with my divorce from earlier this year. I've essentially got half the income to continue paying for the house and all the utilities, plus payments on a loan I had to take out to pay my ex-wife for her half of the house's equity. It's not an untenable situation, but I had to make some hard cutbacks shortly before the economy went south. On the plus side, I have zero credit card debt, my car (a fuel-efficient Civic Hybrid -- the smartest purchase I've ever made) is paid for, and I make sure everything I buy these days is paid for with cash (well, debit card, technically).
  4. My girlfriend has an express interest in personal finances. She maintains her own financial blog, and has a solid understanding (or as solid as anyone can have these days) of the financial pressures rippling through the economy.
Now, forget about all the garbage you've heard about how this whole mess got started. The practical, how-it-impacts-me perspective is what concerns us here. Because, frankly, even the financial experts don't know what the hell is going on. (The CEO of my company -- again, AAA credit rating, one of the largest corporations in the world -- spoke to a group of us, and the best he could come up with was, "Shit happens." Actual quote. The guy is a financial wizard, and the best explanation he can devise was "Shit happens.")

So what does the financial crisis mean to me?

Well, let's look at some data. Here's the estimated sales numbers (courtesy of The Comic Chronicles) from the past several months of Marvel's and DC's top-selling, event-driven titles.
Secret InvasionFinal Crisis
April250,213N/A
May182,390144,784
June175,670126,034
July175,423N/A
August165,871123,815
September164,393N/A
Although there's a downward trend for both, that's not atypical of any title, and hardly surprising given some of the critiques I've heard/read of both events. Also, since both titles' sales declines began before the current economic crisis, neither would suggest that any economic downturn.

Of course, this is something of a lagging indicator since we don't have any data yet beyond September -- when the economy as a whole tanked. And we're also looking at the most popular books, which are probably the least volatile. Looking down to the lower end of things, how about we take a look at (the arbitrarily selected) Witchblade from Image Comics and Lone Ranger from Dynamic...
WitchbladeLone Ranger
April16,51515,071
MayN/AN/A
June14,768N/A
July16,711N/A
AugustN/A12,900
September15,06412,892
Again, not great numbers, but not unexpected. The biggest drop is seen in Ranger but only after a several-month gap between issues. For all intents and purposes, these numbers all look pretty normal.

Here's another indicator that comics aren't in much trouble. Marvel's stock price...You can see that the lowest their stock price has dipped recently ($29) is still higher than all but the highest peaks of 2007 (the highest being only $30.91).

Time Warner, the folks who own DC, don't look quite so hot...But as you can see, they took their big hit between 2000 and 2002. They did dip below $10 a couple times in October, but that was from only from hovering around $15 for most of this year. A hit, certainly, but not a devastating one. Furthermore, Time Warner does own a few other things besides a comic book publisher, so their data isn't going to be 100% applicable to a comics discussion anyway.

So far, this seems to suggest evidence of the notion that comics are recession-proof. Of course, anecdotal evidence suggests exactly the opposite, as I'll look at in my next post.

To be continued...
Hot diggity! Jim Ottaviani has started a blog! Now I can find out what he's been up to lately! Apparently, he recently finished an online comic called Better Zombies Through Physics and he's currently working on T-Minus about Alexei Leonov (and possibly other space race stuff).
Lew Stringer points out and reviews the 97 years of The Daily Mirror has been posted online, focusing mainly on the comics. Might be worth checking out just to see Andy Capp's son, Buster!
A little while back, I reviewed Colin Panetta's Dead Man Holiday. Like any other self-published comic, it was a personal work on all fronts. Not only did Panetta write, draw and publish it himself but he also worked hard from a promotional perspective, trying to get the word out about his book.

This morning, on his blog, Panetta takes a step back to critically look at his work so far. Whether you've read Dead Man Holiday or not, and whether you enjoyed it or not, I think this post itself is worth reading through. Especially if you're creating or thinking about creating a comic on your own. Panetta looks back at not only the actual creation process he went through, but also the marketing and follow-up. While it's clear that he's disappointed about the book's commercial success, and the fact that his own grandmother didn't really understand it, he's still able to look back on his efforts with a critical eye. What worked? What didn't?

While he doesn't come to many firm conclusions about why he hasn't been able to sell more books, he does have the cajones to address any number of possible issues including the book's content itself. Now, I'm by no means a good judge of what will become popular and/or why. Even when I was reading mainstream superhero comics, the ones I enjoyed tended to be B- and C-list titles. (I have yet to figure out why Christopher Priest's Black Panther didn't sell like hotcakes, and Reggie Hudlin's Black Panther warrants a TV show.) But that Panetta is addressing the issue in such a straightforward manner, and is willing to share with the Internet some of his own failings, speaks well to his character as a budding comic book professional.

That alone, I think, warrants a look at Dead Man Holiday, if you haven't already seen it.
Yeah, I know. You're seeing a slew of personal opinions and analyses and whatnot about yesterday's presidential election, and you really don't care all that much about my thoughts. But, since it's still on my mind, this post is going to touch on that. But, hopefully, with a slightly different spin, as suggested by this post's title.

(Side note: I read the Occasional Superheroine's post on the subject while I was in the middle of writing this. I like to think we have very different takes on the topic.)

First off, I've been an Obama supporter for a while now (on the off chance you haven't figured that out). I don't think he's the Second Coming of Jesus or a resurrected JFK. I don't think the country will suddenly be a magical place once he's inaugurated. I just happen to think he's got some good foreign, economic, and energy policies. I happen to disagree with most of John McCain's policies, and I grew increasingly concerned about the seeming lack of forethought he kept using throughout his campaign. But I never thought he was a devil-spawn or anything like that.

I say these things to (hopefully) show that I approached the whole election with pragmatism, and that I'm not about to suggest that we're all going to get rocket packs on January 21. Race relations aren't going suddenly become a non-issue. The economy isn't going to magically pull out of its tailspin. He's not going to pull every American soldier out of Iraq. I'm certainly more optimistic now than I've been in the better part of a decade, but I'm think I'm pretty grounded in realism.

So what, then, does an Obama presidency REALLY mean for the comic book industry?

There are going to be some very UNhappy comic book creators. I don't know any myself, but there are undoubtably some creators who don't like anything Obama stands for and think the country is doomed to four years of absolute hell. That, I expect, though, will have less of an impact on their work since just about everybody, regardless of party affiliation, has had the failing economy on their mind lately. People were already in a sour mood and, while an Obama victory isn't uplifting for them, it likely also won't make them any more pessimistic. The crowd at McCain's concession speech (as well as the attitudes of Republicans I know) suggested disappointment, but no real anger or bitterness.

But in the short term, there are going to be some very happy comic book creators. The handful that I personally know were/are Obama supporters, and I'm sure are much happier as of late last night. I'm sure that's going to impact their work at least at a subconscious level.

Oh, sure, we'll see Obama make appearances in the comics like we've seen Kennedy, Nixon, Carter, Reagan, Clinton and G.W. (Offhand, I don't recall seeing George H.W. Bush in any comic.) Indeed, we've already seen Obama show up in Savage Dragon. But those appearances are largely immaterial. Generally, the story just calls for "The President" to make a cameo and it's drawn like whoever holds that office at the time because it provides an immediacy and topicality on top of the heightened level of importance. "Oh, wow! Iron Man is being ordered to stand down by the President himself? This must be big!"

But, more significantly, those creators who are more optimistic now because of Obama's overall approach will likely change their approach. Whether you agree with him or not, Obama's message of hope and optimism resonated with many people and that will infect their work.

Case in point: Marvel's Civil War. The White House, over the last eight years, has been characterized by deception, power-grabbing, polarization, preemptive attacks, alienation of ideals... And as more and more of this type of baggage was added to the country by the Executive Office, Marvel responded with Civil War. You can argue the book's degree of success on a qualitative level, but it's undeniably a reaction to what Marvel's creators were seeing in our government.

I know I certainly became more and more distraught over the state of America, at the same time I was getting more and more distraught over the state of the Marvel Universe. And it was precisely the fact that Art was imitating Life that I stopped reading Marvel comics. I heard enough unsettling news through news reports; I didn't want to see more of the same in my entertainment. The Marvel Universe, I think, was still a fun place in 2000. But it became a darker and darker place alongside America, both culminating into something really ugly by 2007.

I think Obama's presidency will affect comics in much the same way. The manner in which he leads the nation, if it follows the manner in which he led his campaign, will bring brighter, more optimistic stories. Will that mean I'm going to be picking Marvel comics again? Not necessarily -- the economy still sucks, so I won't be able to afford it for at least a while. But I'll probably keep closer tabs on their comics than I have of late.

But that's about all an Obama presidency is going to lend to comics, I figure. He can't wave his hand and suddenly have 200,000 more people head off to their LCS every week. He can't suddenly make paper and/or printing costs diminish to pass savings on to readers. Even the suggested economic stimulus package won't have that dramatic an impact on comic sales since people are still spending more on food and gas.

"Superman couldn't change what's in store for the U.S. economy. It's going to be ugly," Rich Yamarone, director of economic research at Argus Research, told CNN earlier today.

From what I've seen, just about all economists agree that the U.S. isn't going to do particularly well fiscally -- regardless of what measures are enacted -- until at least 2010. There's certainly things Obama could do to make things better or worse, but there won't be a wholesale recovery any time during his first year on the job. And even if things do show signs of improvement, I've also read of a possible "affluent deprivation" -- where people feel poorer, even if their wages are holding steady with inflation. Under those circumstances, comic fans will certainly hold on to their wallets a little tighter.

And while Obama has talked of hope, he's also made references to making sacrifices as well. For comic fans, that might translate as not buying the really cool character statue. Or being particularly choosy about which comics they purchase from month to month. Or being more apt to drop a book if it's no longer entertaining them. Or switching to online comics entirely.

The practical upshot is that Obama will have comparatively little direct impact on the comic industry. Ben Burnanke, who will remain in his post as Fed Chair until 2010, is more likely to have an effect on the comic industry for the next couple of years. Comics, after all, are a business and operate as such. Meaning they have to borrow money to generate income. That's what Burnanke is essentially in charge of. Obama's influence, by contrast, will be more ephemeral. Readers might get a vague sense of comics being collectively different in tone by 2012 -- but it's likely not something they'll be able to pinpoint.

"I think comics are more fun now than they were in 2008."

"What do you mean?"

"I don't know. The Fantastic Four just don't seem as cynical as they were a few years ago."

And as much as I do enjoy a good dystopian story (there's some irony in there somewhere, I think) I'm looking forward to seeing creators putting their hopes and dreams back into their work, instead of just their nightmares.
It's Election Day here in the U.S. so I thought I'd present a collection of today's comic strips centered around that very topic...


UPDATE: I found another couple dozen comics to include.