Latest Posts

Tom Scioli is well-known for an illustration style that strongly resembles Jack Kirby's, so it makes sense that he would be the one to craft a graphic novel biography of Kirby. Of course, the danger in this is that he's effectively raising the bar on himself, particularly after working in this vein for over two decades now. Over the years, he has proven himself to be a very talented storyteller, and not just a walking pastiche of Kirby, so expectations for this new work were fairly high as soon as it was announced.

The story is told from primarily Kirby's own perspective and covers from slightly before was born in 1917 until 2021 -- referencing the Eternals and New Gods films still currently under development. Scioli tries to cover everything and some of the work Kirby is most known/celebrated for -- the creation of the Fantastic Four and the subsequent Marvel Universe -- doesn't come up until page 107, over half-way through the book. I liked this aspect in that I don't think Kirby's early life is covered very much; I appreciated that Scioli was willing/able to spend a fair amount of time there. However, the down side to this is that the back half started to seem a bit rushed, as if he realized he only had so many pages left to work with and had to hit a lot of things quickly in order to get the rest of it in. I think the book could comfortably have been another 20-25% longer, but I expect there were publisher/pricing considerations to take into account.

The book also covers Kirby's personal life beyond comics. Beyond just his childhood, we see his romance with his future wife Roz, his time in the army, his time with his kids and (to a lesser extent) his grandkids. While Kirby certainly spent much of his life in/around comics, we do see him in a more rounded light here. And while I never had the pleasure to meet Kirby in person myself, from the clips and interviews that I have seen of him, Scioli seems to do a good job capturing his character throughout the book.

I've been studying Kirby for decades now, so there was little in here that I didn't already know. But what Scioli does put in clearly involved a great deal of research. Some of the incidents and anecdotes that were included here were ones I've only seen discussed once or twice. The more well-known stories are in there, too, of course, but that that Scioli was able to include as much as he did helped to give that well-rounded look at Kirby that I mentioned earlier.

Another aspect I quite liked was how Scioli transitioned from one period to another. Frequently, when I see writing about Kirby, it's focused on a very specific time period or a very specific aspect of his career. What I don't see often are those transition periods: after he left Mainline but before he started back at DC, after he left Marvel but before his first issue of Jimmy Olsen came out, after he left Marvel (again) but before he started working at Ruby-Spears, etc. It would have been easy to put decisive chapter breaks between them, but Scioli opts for a more continuous story flow. He hits all of those different eras but ensures that they connect with one another smoothly. I think this is something most looks at Kirby's life don't do very well.

It's obviously worth mentioning the art itself. Scioli opts here for using a pencils-only approach, so it doesn't bear as close a resemblance to the actual Kirby art you're probably more familiar with, regardless if you prefer Joe Sinnott or Vince Colletta or Mike Royer or anyone else inking his work. Futher, while Scioli does still primarily draw the book in a style reminiscent of Kirby, the drawings of Kirby himself are decidedly not drawn in the same style but something more akin to manga. I don't know if this was an attempt to put the reader more in Kirby's shoes, as the figure doesn't resemble Kirby as much as other characters resemble the actual people they are depicting. Given that the only other figure in the book that's really cartooned at all is Stan Lee (although not to the extent that Kirby is) I suspect that may be the case. And while I don't mind the idea conceptually, it did prove a little distracting when Kirby was interacting with other real world people. I wonder if the cartooning approach to Kirby would've meshed better if Scioli drew him perhaps more akin to Kirby's own self-caricature from "This Is a Plot?" or something.

I will also note that Scioli's research in the illustration shines again. A great many panels were drawn from actual photographs and/or comic book pages. Scioli redraws all the artwork superbly (regardless if it was originally by Kirby or another artist) and the photo references all seem to drop in organically -- they don't feel like he was drawing it in just because he had that particular photo to reference. While the average reader probably wouldn't recognize many of the photos, that Scioli uses them in a natural manner lends additional credence to the story he's telling. The reader gets the sense that, yup, this is what happened.

I think all but the most knowledgeable Kirby afficiandos will learn something about the King of Comics from this book. And while there are few minor elements to the execution I wouldn't have minded seeing changed and lengthened a bit, it's still an excellent book and helps present a solid picture of Jack Kirby, the man over Jack Kirby, the legend.
Back in April, I made note of some concerns regarding the US Postal Service and how the coronavirus was having an impact on things. Mainly in that they were in some financial trouble because Republicans under G.W. Bush basically hamstrung them, forcing them virtually overnight to completely pre-fund their entire pension plan for every employee for the next 75 years!

Super Heroes Stamp AlbumThings are actually much worse now. Trump appointed Louis DeJoy as the postmaster general in June. Last month, he began implementing policies to deliberately slow -- and in some cases halt -- mail delivery. DeJoy has no postal experience himself and has upwards of $75 million in holdings in USPS's own competitors! Trump has actively campaigned on limiting mail-in ballots for the upcoming election, and with DeJoy as a large Trump donor (the primary reason he got the job), DeJoy has a very vested interest in seeing the post office fail.

The concerns I had back in April about the USPS basically allowing the economy to continue moving because so many indivdiuals and businesses were conducting transactions via the mail has been magnified a thousand-fold. And that's on top of the active effort to disenfranchise voters who might be (justifiably!) too scared of contracting COVID to actually go to the polls in person! I've heard a few people say these changes are actually treasonous, and I frankly have trouble arguing otherwise. Everything they are forcing the post office to do right now undermines both the fairness of our elections and the basic economy itself. (Not to mention that it's got racism built into it, since postal workers are over twice as likely to be Black as in anywhere in the private sector.)

There is nothing about this situation the post office is being forced into that isn't downright evil. Contact your state and local representatives, particularly if they're Republicans, and get them to do anything they can to oust DeJoy (who is in direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1703) as soon as possible.

RESOURCES
Seattle Times: "New cuts threaten the Postal Service when it’s most needed"
Seattle Times: "Mail delays likely as new postal boss pushes cost-cutting"
Washington Post: "Postal Service overhauls leadership as Democrats press for investigation of mail delays"
CNN: "Warren and other top Democrats ask USPS watchdog to investigate practices"
New York Times: "Mail Delays Fuel Concern Trump Is Undercutting Postal System Ahead of Voting"
Here are this week's links to what I've had published recently...

Kleefeld on Comics: Links for Monday
https://ift.tt/30nOG7i

Kleefeld on Comics: Birds of a Feather
https://ift.tt/39ThwQ2

Kleefeld on Comics: (Mis-)Reading Context
https://ift.tt/39YOjDx

Kleefeld on Comics: Mighty Crusaders Action Figures?
https://ift.tt/3kqklx5

Kleefeld on Comics: The Corpses Of Dr. Sacotti Redux
https://ift.tt/33Abnae


I was doing some research on another book several years ago, and stumbled across this ad running in the middle of one of the comics...
Now this was from 1948 -- before the Kefauver hearings or Seduction of the Innocent and all that -- but it still caught me off guard a bit. The cloaked dude looks like he just pulled that blade out of the cop's bleeding chest. The officer's head and arms look twisted in an unnatural manner as well. It's not really a gory image per se, but it's still fairly explicit. Especially with the word "CORPSES" taking up a good chunk of visual real estate nearby.

I was curious: was this a real book? Was this actually published? Or was the ad something the publisher just threw out there to gauge interest?

Turns out it was a real book all right...
What struck me, though, is that the cover has a less graphic image. Namely, the office is not shown with a puncture wound or blood. The tip of the blade also seems to have shortened a bit in the ad. I tend to think the wound was edited out for the cover, rather than added for the ad. The cop's uniform is shown with wrinkles and folds throughout, but the area over his heart on the cover is strangely undetailed. Perhaps they felt it looked too gruesome when the blood was actually colored red.

The series was actually called Ideal and "The Corpses of Dr. Sacotti" was the first story of issue #2. The first issue debuted with "Antony and Cleopatra" but there was a clear indication that the editors/publishers thought the Sacotti story would be a hit. Here's a two page ad (courtesy of Atlas Tales) from Ideal #1 also promoting the story...

Curiously, it seems it was issue #3 that drew more ire. It featured historical accounts of Joan of Arc and the Second Boer War, but The Evening News of London claimed the editors had an "anti-British slant." Issue #4 focused on Richard the Lion-Hearted, but #5 changed the format to love stories, even changing the logo to read "Ideal Love and Romance." Issue #6 was entirely retitled Love Romances.

From "The Corpses of Dr. Sacotti" to "Hearts Dance on High!" inside of a year!
Back in 1984, apparently to compete with Kenner's Super Powers and Mattel's Secret Wars action figure lines, Remco obtained the license for and produced a small run of figures based on Archie Comics' Mighty Crusaders!
Mighty Crusaders action figures
Michael Neno pointed these out recently on a Facebook post, and I was genuinely surprised I don't recall ever hearing about these. I was never a big Crusaders fan, but they were apparently sold primarily at Kmart, which was a store my family frequented a fair amount back in the '70s and early '80s. (They were cheap, very close, and frankly there weren't many other options we could reasonably get to back then.) So even though I didn't read any Crusaders comics, I was in the Kmart toy aisle pretty regularly in 1984-85. It's possible I did see them and dismissed them out of hand as cheap knock-offs because the production on these is, by all accounts, inferior.

You can clearly see the figure proportions are awkward. Like they were aiming for mimicking the broad/squat He-Man figures, but those figures, while not realistically proportioned, were proportioned well unto themselves. Here, the heads are too big, while the legs are far too short and narrow, and connect at the hip uncomfortably. Not to mention just being crudely sculpted with sloppy paint jobs. Not that Remco was ever known for producing high-quality toys! And when they were competing directly agaist better quality figures from Kenner and Mattel, who had more popular licenses, it's no real surprise these figures found their way to the discount bins really quickly.

(As an aside, Remco was no stranger to comic book licenses. They had produced the "Energized Spider-Man" in 1978, "instant" Hulk muscles in 1979, Sgt. Rock and Warlord action figure lines in 1982, and Crystar action figures in 1983. The Warlord figures more closely resemble the He-Man proportions, so I can't imagine how/why they missed so badly on the Crusaders. They literally could have re-purposed the Warlord bodies mold and been miles ahead, both in terms of sculpting quality and cost savings!)

While the Mighty Crusaders as a group didn't appear until late 1965, some of the individual characters date back to the early 1940s. Interestingly, the original characters were largely born out of the desire to ride the coattails of the success of Superman and Batman. When they were brought together as a team in 1965, it was done because of the success of The Justice League of America and The Avengers. That 1960s title lasted a scant seven issues (with a few appearances in other comics) before it was cancelled. The title was brought back in 1983, apparently designed specifically to promote the upcoming toy line, much the way Secret Wars was developed. That version lasted thirteen issues. A 1992 series lasted eight issues.

Action figure card back
It would seem that the Mighty Crusaders, always trying to follow trends and seemingly never trying anything that isn't derivative, is always behind the curve enough that they're never very successful. Both in comics and in action figures.

There is one interesting thing of note to comic fans about these otherwise pedestrian and generally unremarkable action figures. The illustrations on the back of the card showcasing the entire figure line were by none other than Steve Ditko! I daresay this is the best these heroes ever looked! Thanks for bringing all this to my attention, Michael!
John Tenniel cartoon
Take a look at this editorial cartoon by John Tenniel from 1871. Because it's not a very hi-res image, I'll inform you that the two swords read "Radicalism" and "Toryism". Now, what is it about?

Well, it will only make sense if you know several things. First, you need to know what radicalism and toryism are. I suspect most folks could guess at radicalism, and assume toryism would be the opposite of that, but that still might be a stretch. Next, you'd need to know what that the subject of the cartoon is performing a Scottish sword dance and, more significantly, you'd need to have seen such an act performed to really understand what's involved in it. Third, you'd need to know that the illustration is of William Gladstone and that, fourth, he was Prime Minister of England at the time the cartoon was drawn. And even then, it would still help to know what platforms he stood upon and what speechs he had given in the latter half of that year.

The cartoon, by itself, for most people simply doesn't make much sense today. It's a just a Scottish guy stepping over a couple of swords. Even after several setences of explanation (see above), it's still doesn't carry much context, despite the incredible execution of the final product and the probably-super-poignent topicalness that it would've had in 1871. But the base of reference is too far removed at this point, and the cartoon doesn't make much sense, let alone seem funny.

Six Chix comic
I bring this up in light of the Six Chix comic I posted about last week. I ended that post by saying, "If you don't get it? If you misread it as being against mask-wearing during a pandemic? Odds are that you're deliberately not getting it. And you can fuck off because you're part of the problem!"

I had a related discussion on Twitter where someone was saying that if you assumed the cartoon was by an anti-mask wearing, right-wing cartoonist, he could see how someone might mistake the intent. My argument, though, is that you're still deliberately mis-reading the cartoon if you take that approach. The science behind mask-wearing is over-whelming. For a character to be so flippant about it, the reader can only take this one of three ways:
  1. You can read the cartoon as intended
  2. Cynically, you can read the cartoon as intended, but actively choose the wrong interpretation for the sake of trashing the cartoonist
  3. You can be willfully dimissive of the science; the extension of which is that you will be willfully dismissive of the cartoon
In the Tenniel cartoon above, you don't have much, if any, context because we're well over a century away from when that happened. But Bianca Xunise's cartoon is current; it's about what is going on right now. Today. That is context that you are unable to get away from. The only way to not understand the context is to be willful about it. Whether that's by only getting your news from Fox, or believing anything Trump says, or whatever, you can't not be deliberate and willful in your thinking about it. You can't feign ignorance here.

Context is every bit as imporant in a cartoon as the content itself. If you misread Xunise's cartoon, you're doing it deliberately. Either by willfully misunderstanding the context, or by willfully misunderstanding the content. And, once again, either way, you can fuck off because you're part of the problem!
I was originally going to dash off a kind of quick, snarky piece today about how the mascots for Comic-Con International and WMMS radio out of Cleveland could be brothers...

WMMS Buzzard
I figured I should include a little background since the Buzzard probably isn't all that familiar outside northeast Ohio. What I found struck me as pretty interesting in its own right.

First, the Toucan, though. Rick Geary moved to San Diego in 1975. He began working on comics and was a regular contributor to National Lampoon, and later had work published in Heavy Metal. Not surprisingly, he became somewhat involved with Comic-Con and, in 1984, came up with a toucan character to be used on letterheads and other stationery. Geary has noted, “At the time, I was big into animals in human clothing, so I drew this generic big-beaked bird, never intending it to be a toucan. Also, I understood at the time that this was just to be used for a few things. I had no notion of it becoming Comic-Con's permanent logo.” But it got to be used more and more, the illustration getting streamlined in the process and, though, in 1995 CCI adopted the "eye" logo they still use today, the toucan (whose name, as far as I can tell, is "Toucan") has continued to show up in various ways.

Although, a radio station in Cleveland using the 100.7 MHz frequency dates back to 1946, the station changed identities several times over the years before landing on a progressive rock format branded as WMMS in 1968. At the time, their logo prominently featured mushrooms and a smoking fairy-like creature. In 1974, listener David Helton sent in a complaint letter in the form of a cartoon. It featured a buzzard perched atop a mushroom, suggesting that the station was dying as evidenced by some format changes he thought they'd recently introduced. (In fact, the change he was complaining about -- that the National Lampoon Radio Hour was cut from an hour to a half-hour -- was a joke by the show itself. "Ha ha! We have a show with 'hour' in the title but it's only 30 minutes long!") In any event, the new program manager John Gorman liked the buzzard character; he thought it tied in with the general sentiment at the time that Cleveland itself was a dying city. They hired Helton to work the buzzard up into the advertising, and he debuted as the station's official mascot in April 1974 in an alternative weekly paper called Zeppelin. The character (who's only ever been called "The Buzzard") has likewise been streamlined over the years, and become more mainstream like the station itself.
Now, here's where it gets interesting. Helton explained his art style from the mid-1970s: “The Buzzard is an oddly drawn fellow — some of my peers say he's hard to draw for them — but of course it came gradually as well. As I grew as an artist and cartoonist and being young I had many influences. The Buzzard started out looking like an 'underground comix' character because I was highly influenced by [Robert] Crumb, [Jay] Lynch and other underground comix artists.”

While Geary, by contrast, cites the likes of Winsor McCay, Franklin Booth, and W. Heath Robinson as influences, that he was living just up the coast a bit from Crumb during the height of the underground comix movement, it's hard to believe there wasn't some influence on his work as well. While Toucan and The Buzzard may not exactly have been brothers, I think there's actually a pretty strong argument that they're cousins.